Tyreek Hill Takes Estranged Wife Back to Court Over Witness Tampering

Tyreek Hill Takes Estranged Wife Back to Court Over Witness Tampering

Tyreek Hill Takes Estranged Wife Back to Court Over Witness Tampering

Tyreek Hill is shutting down accusations from his estranged wife, Keeta Vaccaro, and he’s urging a judge to step in over her baseless witness-tampering claims.

According to court documents, Hill wants the judge to penalize Vaccaro and her lawyer after she accused him of trying to mess with a potential witness before their divorce trial.

At the center of the dispute is Hill’s recent contact with Crystal Espinal, his former partner and the mother of three of his children.

Vaccaro is questioning why Hill suddenly got back in touch with Espinal around deposition time, implying he might’ve been trying to tamper with her testimony.

Hill is denying that.

Hill’s legal team is firing back, saying Vaccaro hasn’t shown a shred of proof that he threatened, misled, or paid off Espinal. They insisted there was “no threat, no misleading statement and no offer of any benefit” because none of it ever happened.

Now, Hill wants the judge to penalize Vaccaro and her lawyer, arguing they crossed the line by basically accusing him of felony witness tampering with zero proof.

More Details Behind Tyreek’s and Keeta’s Divorce

This latest twist is just another chapter in the drama between Hill and Vaccaro, who tied the knot in 2023 and share a young daughter.

In April 2025, Hill’s mother-in-law called 911 expressing concern during an argument at a condominium in Sunny Isles Beach, Florida.

The same month, Vaccaro filed for divorce in 2025, with attached unsealed court records showing domestic abuse claims and recent legal back-and-forth. She stated that their marriage was irretrievably broken.

The former couple has continued to battle over several issues in court.

READ NEXT: Khadijah Haqq Seeks Financial Support From Ex Bobby McCray

For now, Hill’s request for sanctions is just that — a request. There has been no reported court finding that Hill intimidated Espinal, paid her for favorable testimony, or committed witness tampering. Likewise, the court has not ruled that Vaccaro knowingly made false accusations.

The judge’s decision on Hill’s request is still pending.